...
welcome to illegal fishing.info
documents
news
profiles
events
presentations
search site
home  > documents > by date > 701
sign up!
This menu organises news, documents, projects, profiles and links into key topics, and the menu along the top divides the contents of the site by type.

...
New to these issues?
...
New to this site?
...
Glossary of terms
...
[]New to this site
Development, communities and livelihoods
...
Environment, biodiversity and fish stocks
...
[]Impacts
Bycatch / discards
...
Capacity building
...
Certification
...
Chain of custody / Supply chain management
...
Corruption / mismanagement
...
Enforcement
...
Flag state issues
...
Governance / management
...
International trade / WTO
...
Monitoring, control and surveillance
...
Organised crime
...
Port state issues
...
Retail / consumers
...
Tracking technology
...
Transshipment
...
[]Issues
African Union / New Partnership for Africa's Development
...
CITES
...
EU Action Plan
...
EU Common Fisheries Policy
...
FAO / UN High Seas Processes
...
High Seas Task Force
...
RFMOs
...
Southern African Development Community (SADC)
...
US Lacey Act
...
[]Political processes
Africa
...
Central America
...
East Asia
...
Eastern Europe and North Asia
...
Europe
...
Middle East
...
North America
...
Ocean Areas
...
Oceania
...
RFMOs
...
South America
...
South Asia
...
[]countries []rmfos []ocean areas [] ...



tools
contact
search
site map
...
printer friendly version
last updated:

18th Apr 13

Managed by Chatham House
Chatham House logo

Financed by DEFRA
DEFRA logo
To Draw the Line: EU Fisheries Agreements in West Africa

09/11/2009

Author: Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SSNC)


The authors of this report blame the Swedish government for playing a notably passive role in the development of, and during negotiations within the Fisheries Partnership Agreements. The European Commission claims, but cannot ensure, that the payments for these agreements contribute to sustainable development and the implementation of domestic fisheries policy to the benefit of coastal communities. This report demonstrates that they do not.

To Draw the Line concludes that the external dimension of EUs Common Fisheries Policy is a failure. The authors claim the so-called partnership agreements have little to do with partnership and sustainable development, while at the same time preventing other policies from taking responsibility for fishieries as a means of achieving economic development and poverty reduction. In 2012 EU member states are to decide on a new common fisheries policy. To Draw the Line explains the current reform process and provides policy recommendations for those that wish to get involved.


Link to document (2486 k)
...

Related areas:

Impacts/Development, communities and livelihoods
Africa/West Africa
Europe/European Union
...

back to top