...
welcome to illegal fishing.info
documents
news
profiles
events
presentations
search site
home  > presentations > by date > 105
sign up!
This menu organises news, documents, projects, profiles and links into key topics, and the menu along the top divides the contents of the site by type.

...
New to these issues?
...
New to this site?
...
Glossary of terms
...
[]New to this site
Development, communities and livelihoods
...
Environment, biodiversity and fish stocks
...
[]Impacts
Bycatch / discards
...
Capacity building
...
Certification
...
Chain of custody / Supply chain management
...
Corruption / mismanagement
...
Enforcement
...
Flag state issues
...
Governance / management
...
International trade / WTO
...
Monitoring, control and surveillance
...
Organised crime
...
Port state issues
...
Retail / consumers
...
Tracking technology
...
Transshipment
...
[]Issues
African Union / New Partnership for Africa's Development
...
CITES
...
EU Action Plan
...
EU Common Fisheries Policy
...
FAO / UN High Seas Processes
...
High Seas Task Force
...
RFMOs
...
Southern African Development Community (SADC)
...
US Lacey Act
...
[]Political processes
Africa
...
Central America
...
East Asia
...
Eastern Europe and North Asia
...
Europe
...
Middle East
...
North America
...
Ocean Areas
...
Oceania
...
RFMOs
...
South America
...
South Asia
...
[]countries []rmfos []ocean areas [] ...



tools
contact
search
site map
...
printer friendly version
last updated:

18th Apr 13

Managed by Chatham House
Chatham House logo

Financed by DEFRA
DEFRA logo
An Industry Perspective on the EU IUU Regulations

20/10/2009

AIPCE-CEP is the principle seafood processing, importing and exporting organisation in the EU, being recognised by the EC Commission and with seats on the Advisory Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture and the Regional Advisory Councils. The EU is reliant on fishery product imports to the extent of 65% of consumption needs, a figure that has been steadily rising.

AIPCE has initiated a number of initiatives in recent years to ensure that IUU fishery products are not purchased and these were last reported at Chatham House in 2007. These control procedures were first applied to Barents Sea cod and haddock supplies, which in tandem with Governmental controls, saw a massive reduction in IUU, Similar initiatives were undertaken in the Baltic and later in Sri Lanka, although in the latter case, this was to bolster existing good practice in a small scale rather than tackle IUU. AIPCE-CEP supports the IUU Regulations concept, but believe that continued best practice will always be necessary, for example promotion of MSC certification to ensure both sustainable fisheries and whole-chain traceability.

Every effort has been taken though out the IUU Regulation consultation period to ensure that a workable solution to procedures is adopted, thereby reducing the administrative burden on the importing industry without compromising the objectives.

Whilst compromises and improvements have been achieved in terms of small- scale fisheries catch certificates, electronic data exchange and approved economic operator status, a significant administrative burden is still anticipated.

There is great concern that with less than 3 months before the legislation comes into force, that the Implementing Regulations are still in draft; that guidance notes are still awaited, many third countries are still to submit their competent authorities to DG Mare and that it is still not clear who the competent authorities will be across all EU member states.

A degree of pragmatic implementation will therefore be necessary for at least the first 6 months. There will also be a need to keep the effectiveness and working of the Regulations under review.


Related event:

See details for related event '5th International Forum on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing'


Author:

Cliff Morrison


Link to document (505 k)
© Cliff Morrison
...

Related areas:

...

back to top