...
welcome to illegal fishing.info
documents
news
profiles
events
presentations
search site
home  > presentations > by date > 124
sign up!
This menu organises news, documents, projects, profiles and links into key topics, and the menu along the top divides the contents of the site by type.

...
New to these issues?
...
New to this site?
...
Glossary of terms
...
[]New to this site
Development, communities and livelihoods
...
Environment, biodiversity and fish stocks
...
[]Impacts
Bycatch / discards
...
Capacity building
...
Certification
...
Chain of custody / Supply chain management
...
Corruption / mismanagement
...
Enforcement
...
Flag state issues
...
Governance / management
...
International trade / WTO
...
Monitoring, control and surveillance
...
Organised crime
...
Port state issues
...
Retail / consumers
...
Tracking technology
...
Transshipment
...
[]Issues ...
Bycatch / discards

Capacity building

Certification

Chain of custody / Supply chain management

Corruption / mismanagement

Enforcement

Flag state issues

Governance / management

International trade / WTO

Monitoring, control and surveillance

Organised crime

Port state issues

Retail / consumers

Tracking technology

Transshipment

...
African Union / New Partnership for Africa's Development
...
CITES
...
EU Action Plan
...
EU Common Fisheries Policy
...
FAO / UN High Seas Processes
...
High Seas Task Force
...
RFMOs
...
Southern African Development Community (SADC)
...
US Lacey Act
...
[]Political processes
Africa
...
Central America
...
East Asia
...
Eastern Europe and North Asia
...
Europe
...
Middle East
...
North America
...
Ocean Areas
...
Oceania
...
RFMOs
...
South America
...
South Asia
...
[]countries []rmfos []ocean areas [] ...



tools
contact
search
site map
...
printer friendly version
last updated:

18th Apr 13

Managed by Chatham House
Chatham House logo

Financed by DEFRA
DEFRA logo
The EU Regulation 1005/2008 Catch Certification Scheme: A South African Private Sector View

05/11/2009

The invitation to address this forum called for an African perspective but that would prove too difficult for one who has spent a working life in the South African fishing industry. Other than with Namibia, South African fisheries share few developmental commonalities with other African Coastal States and the writer confines himself to what he knows best. That said, there are perhaps too many low-tech, artisanal and quasi-subsistence fisheries in the African arena. Such fisheries may appear deceptively simple on the basis of observed practice and volumes of output, but they often exhibit complex commercial organization and they also play a role in international trade. A trading milieu where they can be advanced and modernized is urgently needed. On the face of it, EC1005/2008 seems poorly crafted to meet the needs of artisanal sectors in African countries and that is perhaps a matter that should be proficiently canvassed in greater depth by experts.

The concerns of third countries in general would not cover a wide range of issues, at least not at this time. The time to consider philosophical matters is past—we must now focus almost entirely on the mechanics and perhaps some of the legal implications of the certification scheme, as explained to non-Members in seminar and in the Technical and Information Notes issued together with Regulation. Implementing Rules and Guidelines, promised midyear, have not yet been seen.

South Africa undoubtedly has a far better LRR (Legal, Regulated and Reported) system than anything the Members of the EC are used to and it is hardly surprising that the South African Government, for one, takes some exception to what it seems to regard, at one level at least, as European paternalism. The Government of South Africa has nevertheless commended the objectives of EC1005/2008 and signaled its qualified support. Whether the qualification departs a little far in practice from the requirements so strictly set out in the Regulation remains to be seen.

The private sector has welcomed the intent if not the letter of Regulation itself and is determined to do all it can to ensure that the certification system works smoothly. However, there is an expectation that, as the Regulation now stands, it will be unequal to the needs of our fishing businesses— a statement that may be equally true for many other third countries. Business needs legitimate trade to continue unchanged and undisturbed after 1 January 2010 and at no significant increase in cost to exporters. Lastly, in common with most Third World entities, SA Business wants the Regulation to be implemented in a way that improves opportunities for trade development, something in which the IUU Regulation promises to fail.


Related event:

See details for related event '5th International Forum on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing'


Author:

Roy Bross


Link to document (76 k)
© Roy Bross
...

Related areas:

...

back to top